CO129-541-11 Cheng Kwok Yau- trial judge's notes 1-1-1932 - 31-12-1932 — Page 29

29

Scintilla of eviden09

Ryder.v.Wombwell.L.2.4 STOH.0.32.

"iblin.v.omull L.R.3 P.0.3*1.(at p.3*8).

Hers literally no svidence,if ¿ a U evidemos excluded. "Avary.v.

Bowden" 26.L.J.(R.B.) p.3 (st p.5)("No reasonable evideno9").

P

Conjecture. *seg.vmigrdner" 1 F & Feng (9 Malsbury 588).

JJMKIN, follows;.

Ro: umming up. Ord.9 of 1899 S.78 Question (1()) properly

reserved. Proviso15.78(2). Misdirection is referable to Full Court.

Conduct of trial gasrully might be referred.

(0.J.Is"misdirection" reservable?) No 0.0.R. 06898 parallel.

(Potter: "Reg.v.Tayler II 0.0.2.7.148)(Jourt; This is a bracelet-

Referable).

Jakin;- R ̧v.Meyer ng T.L.R.p.803 (Misdirection is « question of

law).

(Qourt: Ord.9 of 1890.5.78: " the trial of any idiotment" „Hold:

After verdict,not too late to reserve)

Dose not wish to be heard, if proviso,8,78(2) does not arise in

mindof dourt. (Court 1nvites him to proceed).

Jnking-

(1) Duty(unless simple onse) of julge to direct as to law

& faots.

(2) To sift muss of evidence and mauro jury's appreciation. (3) To sselst jury to avoid miscarriage of justice.

(4) Spetohes of counsel do not relieve judge of duty.

(5) Indsquacy of summing up - worse than NO19.

(#) Direction ma to bearing of various facts upon issus. (”) fvideos of other transactionL# the express direction

as to legitists purpose of evidmoo.

(8) special circumstance (9.g.conditional nardor)affecting

value of testimony, jury to be warned.

*Cohen CAB (1909) C.C.A. P.207.

"Hilliard's one 9.0.0.A.P.175.

"Hoill's OBBA 10.0.0.A. 207.

"Bird's Caas

11.0.0.A. 189

"Finch,s Ülgo. 12 0.0.A.

*Hamilton's Onse 13 0.0.A.

"Twigg's GAB9 14 0.0.A.

"Bartlett's Omas 14 0.0.A. 157

*Bailey's Cha9(1924) 2.K.B.305 (at p.305).

"Smith's Caes 18 0.0.A.19 (p.20)

"Hayton's OMBA 18 0.0.A. 169

"Marohall

* Fox

"Ronton

18 0.0.A. 184

18 0.0.A. 198

19 C.C.A. 33

(self; 1(*) confined to one point) Davidson 20 0.0.4.60

(Adjourned.